Comments on: Baldness is not a Disability (in case you thought otherwise) http://www.pjhlaw.co.uk/blog/baldness-is-not-a-disability-in-case-you-thought-otherwise/ Exclusively Employment Law Tue, 07 Oct 2008 04:17:52 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1 By: Emma http://www.pjhlaw.co.uk/blog/baldness-is-not-a-disability-in-case-you-thought-otherwise/#comment-1832 Emma Mon, 28 Apr 2008 07:54:42 +0000 http://www.pjhlaw.co.uk/blog/baldness-is-not-a-disability-in-case-you-thought-otherwise/#comment-1832 Thank you for your comment. I agree that had the claim been for depression caused by taunts due to Mr Campbell's baldness it could have been covered by the DDA. Kind regards. Emma Cohen Thank you for your comment. I agree that had the claim been for depression caused by taunts due to Mr Campbell’s baldness it could have been covered by the DDA.

Kind regards.

Emma Cohen

]]> By: Andrew Robinson http://www.pjhlaw.co.uk/blog/baldness-is-not-a-disability-in-case-you-thought-otherwise/#comment-1830 Andrew Robinson Fri, 25 Apr 2008 09:29:07 +0000 http://www.pjhlaw.co.uk/blog/baldness-is-not-a-disability-in-case-you-thought-otherwise/#comment-1830 A sensible judgement but would the result be the same if Mr Campbell had been claiming for depression caused by the taunts etc due to his baldness. This is covered by the DDA and it should have been found in his favour. A sensible judgement but would the result be the same if Mr Campbell had been claiming for depression caused by the taunts etc due to his baldness. This is covered by the DDA and it should have been found in his favour.

]]>