PJH Employment Law Solicitors Employment Law Solicitors  

Archive for the ‘Compromise Agreements’ Category

Saturday job for HR Professionals?

By Philip - Monday, July 7th, 2008

HR Readers - this may be of interest! The Government are consulting about whether to include CIPD professionals within the definition of “relevant advisor.” If this gets the go ahead, CIPD members could advise on compromise agreements, thereby earning some extra pocket money!

The one down side of the proposal is that about 5% of proposed compromise agreements do not get signed and end up at ET. If a CIPD member is advising  then unless they were authorised claims practitioners  they could not act in the claim, meaning a dis-continuity of service to the client.

Anyway I can’t see Solicitors wanting CIPD members parking their tanks on their lawn, can you?  And can you imagine someone just handed a compromise agreement by HR, thinking I know I must go and see a CIPD member to negotiate this, as they will be able to see my side rather than HRs. Mmmmm. Don’t think so.

Consultation here

AddThis Social Bookmark ButtonAddThis Feed Button

Similar Posts:

One size fits all?

By Philip - Friday, January 5th, 2007

 One size fits all, one size fits all - as the Crystal Palace fans used to sing about defender Fitz Hall, now at Bolton. Well in the world of compromise agreements, one size does not necessarily fitz hall fit all . The case reported here is a timely reminder that compromise agreements need to be bespoke rather than off the peg. In particular in the recitals of the Agreement you need to ensure that it reads that it is confirmed that the conditions regulating this Agreement in section 203 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 are satisfied, as well as any other claims under other jurisdictions. Bt compromised potential claims for Unfair Dismissal and Race Discrimination in the main body of the Agreement but the recitals only confirmed that the conditions under the Employment Rights Act were met. The recitals did not confirm that the conditions under the Race Relations Act were met. This meant that the employee could proceed with her Race claim, even though she had signed a compromise agreement settling it.Doh!

AddThis Social Bookmark ButtonAddThis Feed Button

Similar Posts:



Employment Law | Employment Law Training | Employment e-Learning
Dignity at Work | Employment Law Solutions | Employment Laws
Employment Law Services