Don’t shoot the messenger….
by Philip
………Or in this case the postman.
The EAT in a robust decision rejected two appeal for being late. The time limit for lodging an appeal is 42 days from the date the Tribunal decision was sent to the parties.
The EAT have limited bandwidth to accept late claims.
In both appeals the Appellants’ representatives had sent the appeal papers by post before the time limit had expired.
One had sent it two days before expiry. The postal service was such that the appeal arrived late.
The second appeal was sent originally to the Tribunal office that had made the decision. As the Simpsons may say: Doh! and was sent with an incorrect case number-double doh!
Both parties representatives had to appear on oath at the EAT and be cross examined by the judge to explain their actions.
Needless to say both appeals were out of time.
Points arising:
- The EAT was less than impressed by the fact that one representative had sat on his thumbs for the first five weeks of the 42 limitation period.
- The EAT was less than impressed by the fact that once the appeal was committed to the post, both representatives sat on their “laurels” and did nothing to check that the appeal had arrived.
Learning points:
- Do not leave claims or Appeals to the last moment.
- Do not use the post, unless you use guarenteed next day delivery.
- Check that the office you have sent the claim or appeal to has received it.
Pretty basic stuff but many representatives seem to be hardwired to leave everything until the last moment.
Similar Posts:



Do you have any more details on these cases? I am currently awaiting a decision from the Appeal Tribunal in my case where I was the successful claimant, winning an Unfair Dismissal and SD claim. The respondent missed the deadline by 5 days. It pleases me therefore that the EAT reached this conclusion in these cases and am hopeful that the same decsion will be reached in my case.
Louise said at September 12th, 2008 at 12:45 pm
Louise-click the link in the post to find the case.
Philip said at September 12th, 2008 at 12:48 pm
Thanks, the EAT found the appellant in my case to be out of time too. If you are interested in reading both the original judgement and EAT decision on the Extension of Time, please let me know.
Louise said at November 3rd, 2008 at 8:04 pm