It’s those bare necessities!

by Philip

Back to employment law today.

It’s those bare necessities, those simple bare necessities. Wise words from Walt Disney.The EAT have, refreshingly, gone back to basics with the whole issue of implied contract of employment and agency workers. In a nutshell terms will only be implied if it is necessary. In the case reported here the EAT have said it is not necessary to imply a contract of employment. Fact sensitive may be, but is the law reversing away from implying contracts of employment to agency workers? We’ll keep you posted.

This entry was posted on Friday, February 23rd, 2007 at 10:38 am and is filed under Who is an Employee?. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Similar Posts:

• Triangular worker, agency, end user relationships-those bare necessities!
• Implied contracts take a knock
• No need to imply!
• Implied Term
• Agency Worker as employee?