<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Redundancy - Unfair Procedure - No Change to Selection</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pjhlaw.co.uk/blog/redundancy-unfair-procedure-no-change-to-selection/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pjhlaw.co.uk/blog/redundancy-unfair-procedure-no-change-to-selection/</link>
	<description>Exclusively Employment Law</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 13:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Liam</title>
		<link>http://www.pjhlaw.co.uk/blog/redundancy-unfair-procedure-no-change-to-selection/#comment-2118</link>
		<dc:creator>Liam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 12:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pjhlaw.co.uk/blog/redundancy-unfair-procedure-no-change-to-selection/#comment-2118</guid>
		<description>We would need to know a bit more detail about what has happened and what is happening in order to assist you. Certainly if selection for training has been made on an unlawfully discriminatory basis such as sex, age or race, this could make a dismissal unfair and give rise to a discrimination complaint.

If you would like to discuss further, please call us on 0870 350 5805.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We would need to know a bit more detail about what has happened and what is happening in order to assist you. Certainly if selection for training has been made on an unlawfully discriminatory basis such as sex, age or race, this could make a dismissal unfair and give rise to a discrimination complaint.</p>
<p>If you would like to discuss further, please call us on 0870 350 5805.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham Fleming</title>
		<link>http://www.pjhlaw.co.uk/blog/redundancy-unfair-procedure-no-change-to-selection/#comment-2114</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham Fleming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 18:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pjhlaw.co.uk/blog/redundancy-unfair-procedure-no-change-to-selection/#comment-2114</guid>
		<description>Dear Sir Madam

My Company announced 130 redunduneces in nov.2007 we have now completed the process of vollenteers, for which they are approx 50 short. we have now been told who is at risk, during the process we belive that managament have selectetd people for extra traing to increase there scoring, should this trianing have been offered to all employes.

With Thanks

G Fleming
07738829117</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Sir Madam</p>
<p>My Company announced 130 redunduneces in nov.2007 we have now completed the process of vollenteers, for which they are approx 50 short. we have now been told who is at risk, during the process we belive that managament have selectetd people for extra traing to increase there scoring, should this trianing have been offered to all employes.</p>
<p>With Thanks</p>
<p>G Fleming<br />
07738829117</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liam</title>
		<link>http://www.pjhlaw.co.uk/blog/redundancy-unfair-procedure-no-change-to-selection/#comment-2100</link>
		<dc:creator>Liam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 08:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pjhlaw.co.uk/blog/redundancy-unfair-procedure-no-change-to-selection/#comment-2100</guid>
		<description>Employer's conducting a redundnacy exercise are under an obligation to behave fairly and consult with a view to avoiding redundancies. As part of the consultation process, employees are entitled to suggest that the employer calls for voluntary redundancies. Whether the employer does so or not is a factor that a Tribunal may consider in examining the fairness of any dismissal, but a failure to call for redundancies does not necessarily make any dismissals unfair.

If you require specific advice, please give me a call on 0870 350 5805.

Liam Pike
Solicitor</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Employer&#8217;s conducting a redundnacy exercise are under an obligation to behave fairly and consult with a view to avoiding redundancies. As part of the consultation process, employees are entitled to suggest that the employer calls for voluntary redundancies. Whether the employer does so or not is a factor that a Tribunal may consider in examining the fairness of any dismissal, but a failure to call for redundancies does not necessarily make any dismissals unfair.</p>
<p>If you require specific advice, please give me a call on 0870 350 5805.</p>
<p>Liam Pike<br />
Solicitor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liam</title>
		<link>http://www.pjhlaw.co.uk/blog/redundancy-unfair-procedure-no-change-to-selection/#comment-2099</link>
		<dc:creator>Liam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 07:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pjhlaw.co.uk/blog/redundancy-unfair-procedure-no-change-to-selection/#comment-2099</guid>
		<description>A redundancy situation arrises when an employer's requirements for employees doing work of a particular kind cease or diminish. 

If the new role is a completely different role to those at risk of redundancy then it is not a problem to recruit for that role before, during, or after redundancies elsewhere in the business.

If the new role is similar to the roles at risk of redundancy it would be prudent to allow those at risk of redundancy to apply for the new role if they wish (although there is no requirement, in most cases, to offer at risk employees the role). It is not uncommon for employers to propose a restructure, place existing roles at risk of redundancy and show at risk employees a list of proposed jobs in the new structure for which they can apply along with external applicants.

If you require specific advice, please give me a call on 0870 350 5805.

Liam Pike
Solicitor</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A redundancy situation arrises when an employer&#8217;s requirements for employees doing work of a particular kind cease or diminish. </p>
<p>If the new role is a completely different role to those at risk of redundancy then it is not a problem to recruit for that role before, during, or after redundancies elsewhere in the business.</p>
<p>If the new role is similar to the roles at risk of redundancy it would be prudent to allow those at risk of redundancy to apply for the new role if they wish (although there is no requirement, in most cases, to offer at risk employees the role). It is not uncommon for employers to propose a restructure, place existing roles at risk of redundancy and show at risk employees a list of proposed jobs in the new structure for which they can apply along with external applicants.</p>
<p>If you require specific advice, please give me a call on 0870 350 5805.</p>
<p>Liam Pike<br />
Solicitor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.pjhlaw.co.uk/blog/redundancy-unfair-procedure-no-change-to-selection/#comment-2098</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 18:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pjhlaw.co.uk/blog/redundancy-unfair-procedure-no-change-to-selection/#comment-2098</guid>
		<description>While still in the consultation phase, is a company allowed to advertise and interview for a new position that will not have been created until the redundancies have been made?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While still in the consultation phase, is a company allowed to advertise and interview for a new position that will not have been created until the redundancies have been made?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.pjhlaw.co.uk/blog/redundancy-unfair-procedure-no-change-to-selection/#comment-2097</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 17:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pjhlaw.co.uk/blog/redundancy-unfair-procedure-no-change-to-selection/#comment-2097</guid>
		<description>My employer is making 20+ people redundant. Do they have to offer voluntary redundancy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My employer is making 20+ people redundant. Do they have to offer voluntary redundancy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liam</title>
		<link>http://www.pjhlaw.co.uk/blog/redundancy-unfair-procedure-no-change-to-selection/#comment-1089</link>
		<dc:creator>Liam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 08:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pjhlaw.co.uk/blog/redundancy-unfair-procedure-no-change-to-selection/#comment-1089</guid>
		<description>Employers do, in appropriate circumstances, have the right to reject applications for voluntary redundancy. If you think you are being treated unfairly, please give me a call on 0870 350 5805.

Liam Pike
Solicitor</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Employers do, in appropriate circumstances, have the right to reject applications for voluntary redundancy. If you think you are being treated unfairly, please give me a call on 0870 350 5805.</p>
<p>Liam Pike<br />
Solicitor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Rae</title>
		<link>http://www.pjhlaw.co.uk/blog/redundancy-unfair-procedure-no-change-to-selection/#comment-608</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Rae</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 11:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pjhlaw.co.uk/blog/redundancy-unfair-procedure-no-change-to-selection/#comment-608</guid>
		<description>My employer is planning to make 11 redundancies.  Volunteers are requested in the first instance. If over subscribed they plan to choose the 11 "least expensive" to go. They have also stated that certain people within the business will not be pemitted to aplly for voluntary redundancy thus the likleyhood of compulsary will be increased. Is this legal?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My employer is planning to make 11 redundancies.  Volunteers are requested in the first instance. If over subscribed they plan to choose the 11 &#8220;least expensive&#8221; to go. They have also stated that certain people within the business will not be pemitted to aplly for voluntary redundancy thus the likleyhood of compulsary will be increased. Is this legal?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
